Anglican synod affirms same-sex blessings in theory, denies them in practise

Anglican synod affirms same-sex blessings in theory, denies them in practise

By Jim Coggins

Fred Hiltz, newly elected head of the Anglican Church of Canada, has gone on record as a supporter of same-sex blessings
A meeting this past weekend, which many hoped would provide a definitive answer on the question of same-sex unions, has left the Anglican Church of Canada (ACC) confused and still divided over gay-related issues.

Despite this, the ACC's newly-elected head still supports the approval of same-sex blessings by the Diocese of New Westminster in BC.

Archbishop Fred Hiltz told CBC.ca that, if there was a change in the status quo in B.C. churches, "it would create a pastoral crisis for that diocese and those parishes where authority has been granted for the blessing of same-sex relations. They've been given authority to proceed and it will be taken away for them. It would create a dilemma."

Hiltz was responding to the results of the ACC's General Synod, held June 19 - 25 in Winnipeg.

Michael Ingham, the controversial bishop of the Diocese of New Westminster -- who has spearheaded the drive toward same-sex blessings -- saw no real progress resulting from the Synod.

"I think everyone's a loser," he told the Anglican Journal.

"Traditional Christians can't take comfort in the vote," he said, "and those who want to move on are held back by a small number of bishops."

Asked how he intends to respond pragmatically to the vote, Ingham told the Vancouver Sun: "We'll be making a decision in the next few weeks . . . We'll have to look at what the general synod said and what its implications are for us."

In principle, he told the Sun, "We remain strongly committed to supporting gay and lesbian members of our church and in the wider society. Our support . . . is undiminished."

At the Synod, the ACC's three 'houses' -- lay delegates, clergy delegates and bishops -- voted separately on several resolutions relating to homosexuality, sending out mixed signals.

After hours of debate, the synod voted Sunday in favour of a resolution which said "the blessing of same-sex unions is not in conflict with the core doctrine (in the sense of being credal) of the ACC." The laity and clergy, voting together, approved the motion 152 - 97. The House of Bishops voted 21 - 19 in favour.

However, delegates then voted on a resolution that would have allowed individual Anglican dioceses -- regional districts presided over by bishops -- to offer blessing ceremonies to gay couples. It would not have allowed clergy to officiate at homosexual weddings.

This resolution was approved 78 - 59 by the laity, and 63 - 53 by clergy, but defeated 21 - 19 by the House of Bishops. Since approval was required by all three houses, the resolution did not pass.

A third resolution, which would have affirmed the right of eight parishes in the Diocese of New Westminster to continue offering blessings of covenanted gay unions, was then withdrawn.

However, it is expected that the diocese, under Ingham's leadership, will continue to offer the blessings.

Speaking to the Journal immediately after the vote, Edmonton bishop Victoria Matthews said: "We know that people on both sides of the issue -- those who voted for, those who voted against -- leave tonight with a profound sense of sadness, that the body of Christ is so broken."

Ed Hird, BC-based communications director of the Anglican Coalition in Canada (ACiC) -- a group formed by churches which left the ACC over same-sex blessings -- issued a brief statement, declaring:

"As we grieve for the significant 'walking apart' shown by the ACC General Synod, let us compassionately hold in prayer those orthodox Anglicans who are still currently within the ACC, and are being traumatized by these decisions. To many of us, the writing seems on the wall."

While some of the secular press tended to focus on the failed vote, several observers said the decision really meant "not yet."

Ron Chaplin, a member of Integrity, a gay Anglican support group, told the Anglican Journal: "I am not upset. The tide is moving. The first motion makes a theological space for gay and lesbian people in the church."

It is unknown how the decisions made by the ACC will affect its relations with the worldwide Anglican communion, which claims about 77 million members. There is no central authority in the church.

However, a majority of the 38 national bishops recently demanded that the American branch of the communion, the Episcopal Church, cease blessing same-sex unions -- or they would cut off fellowship with the U.S. body.

The worldwide Anglican communion is dominated by conservative, fast-growing national churches in the Third World, particularly Africa.

Some African bishops have begun offering 'episcopal oversight' to conservative congregations in Canada and the US -- in essence, making these congregations part of the African Anglican church.

About 250 congregations have left the Episcopal Church, and 14 have left the ACC. The decisions by General Synod may also cause division within the ACC. The Canadian conservative Anglican movement is led by Anglican Essentials, which has two branches: the Anglican Network in Canada, which consists of congregations which have left the ACC; and the Anglican Federation, which consists of individuals and congregations still within the ACC.

While the denomination's lukewarm endorsement of same-sex couples is unlikely to attract many gays, it is likely to drive out more conservative members. On the Anglican Essentials website, the Anglican Network stated:

"By changing the doctrine of the Church and saying that what God has called sin is not in conflict with the core doctrine of the church, this General Synod has clearly rejected the authority of the Word of God and made its decision. Now we and every Canadian Anglican must make theirs."

Vancouver-based Cheryl Chang, another member of Anglican Essentials, told the Canadian Press that many parishioners won't wait for their congregations to make a decision: "People [will] leave to go to the Catholic church, the Baptist church, the Pentecostal church. That's going to happen starting next Sunday."

Zacchaeus Fellowship -- a support group for people who have struggled with same-sex attraction, but are trying to obey traditional moral standards -- also attended the synod, and issued a news release stating that it was "deeply disappointed" in the results of the vote.

Dawn MacDonald, an Anglican priest in Fort Nelson who chairs the group, told CC.com before the vote that, if the denomination endorsed same-sex blessings, "most Zacchaeus members would seriously ask whether we could stay." She added: "The church would be saying that our faith journeys don't matter, that we were being faithful for nothing."

MacDonald, who served at a Vancouver parish when the Diocese of New Westminster began blessing same-sex unions, expressed pastoral concern for the "silent sufferers" in the pews who are battling with same-sex attraction -- but who will receive no help from a church that will only affirm their attraction.

She said that "the pendulum had to swing" from the time when the church merely condemned people with same-sex attraction. But now, she said, "it has gone too far."

In his statement, Hird said he sympathized with ACC members alienated by the vote: "I remember well how difficult it was for us five years ago, when we walked out from the Diocese of New Westminster Synod. We have discovered from personal experience that there is indeed a way forward."

That way may prove difficult, judging from a statement recently made public by an African Anglican group.

The communique from the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church of Rwanda opens by declining the Archbishop of Canterbury's invitation to the Lambeth 2008 conference, which is the next major gathering of the worldwide communion -- and one of the Anglican church's major symbols of international unity.

The Rwandan statement gives several reasons for the decision, including: "The invitations to Lambeth 2008 have been issued in complete disregard of our conscientious commitment to the apostolic faith once delivered." Further, "The Lambeth 1998 Resolution 1.10 . . . has not been respected by the Episcopal Church of America (TEC), the Anglican Church of Canada, and other like-minded Provinces, which are now violating the resolution as well as holy orders by making the decision to ordain and to consecrate practicing homosexuals."

The statement concludes: "Therefore, in view of the above, in good conscience, the bishops of the Province of the Episcopal Church of Rwanda have resolved not to attend the Lambeth Conference 2008 unless the previously stipulated requirement of repentance on the part of the TEC and other like-minded Provinces is met, and invitations are extended to our entire House of Bishops."

-- additional reporting by David F. Dawes

Continue article >>

Related stories:

Anglican Church at a 'crossroads'
For conservative Canadian Anglicans, a rejection by their church of same-sex marriage blessings next month is no longer enough. They now want the clock turned back on how gays are ministered.
Toronto Star, May 12

Anglican Diocese of B.C. reps favour same-sex blessing
The majority of the Anglican Diocese of B.C. representatives are in favour of the church blessing same-sex marriages, and have urged their delegates to the national conference that will decide the issue to approve the controversial topic which is splitting the church.
CanWest News Service, June 2

Church can't decide
Just weeks before Anglican leaders decide whether their church should bless gay and lesbian unions, one of the few things that appears to be unifying them is a feeling of uncertainty.
Winnipeg Sun, June 3

Bless same-sex unions, retired archbishops urge
As Canada's Anglican Church prepares for its historic -- and possibly schismatic -- decision on blessing homosexual unions, six of its most senior clerics Thursday called for a yes vote that would show "justice, compassion and hope for all God's people." The declaration from the half-dozen retired archbishops from across the country reveals a sharp division in the church's hierarchy.
Globe and Mail, June 14

His house divided
Canadian Anglican Church confronts the issue of homosexuality
Douglas Todd, Vancouver Sun, June 16

Anglicans to vote this week on priests blessing same-sex unions
Planning a wedding is usually complicated, taking months to sort out a seemingly endless parade of details. For Frank Kajfes, 60, the months leading up to the big day with Bryan Wannop, his partner of 30 years, were difficult for another reason.
Canadian Press, June 17

Some Anglican gays switching churches, as same-sex vote looms
While the Anglican Church of Canada prepares to vote this week on whether to let priests bless same-sex couples, a relaxed Christopher McBain is celebrating Edmonton's gay pride week with members of his new church. The former Anglican marched Saturday in the gay pride parade behind a banner for the Robertson-Wesley United Church, a church that welcomes gay, lesbian and transgendered people.
Edmonton Journal, June 17

Divided Anglicans to vote on issue of same-sex union
The religious world will be watching Winnipeg as Canada's oldest Protestant church struggles to avoid a schism in the church
Ottawa Citizen, June 18

Don't tear apart our church
Tomorrow, clergy and laity from the 31 dioceses that make up the Anglican Church of Canada will gather in Winnipeg for the meeting of General Synod. These men and women will make decisions that will guide the church into the future.
Michael Fleming, Ottawa Citizen, June 18

Pie in the sky
The other day, six Anglican archbishops called for the church to bless the unions of same-sex couples. The Anglican Church of Canada is about to have a big vote on the issue, and depending which way they swing it will either deepen the schism within the worldwide Anglican Communion or further isolate the Episcopal Church of the United States. But never mind all that. What struck me was the rationale the archbishops came up with. This gay thing, they sighed. We've been yakking about it for years. Let's just get on with it, and then we can get back to the important stuff. "We are deeply concerned that ongoing study," they fretted, "will only continue to draw us away from issues which are gradually destroying God's creation -- child poverty, racism, global warming, economic injustice, concern for our aboriginal brothers and sisters, and the growing disparity between the rich and the poor."
Mark Steyn, New York Sun, June 18

Same-sex unions up for synod debate
More than 300 Anglican and Evangelical Lutheran delegates to synod to decide whether to follow Vancouver bishop's lead
Vancouver Sun, June 21

Canada won't be expelled, Anglicans say
Same-sex relationships to be voted on Saturday by the church at its general synod meeting in Winnipeg
Vancouver Sun, June 22

Same-sex issue 'marginal' to Lutheran leader
Environment chosen as major theme for joint day of worship by Protestant denominations
Vancouver Sun, June 22

Anglicans delay vote on same-sex unions
The General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada decided late Saturday to defer a vote on the contentious question of blessing same-sex unions.
CBC News, June 23

Moderate to head Anglican Church
Bishop Fred Hiltz is considered an ally by same-sex marriage supporters
Vancouver Sun, June 23

Anglicans vote on same-sex unions
The Anglican Church of Canada has chosen a liberal bishop as its new leader in an election revealing deep divisions between laity and clergy as it heads today into a divisive tussle over same-sex marriage blessings.
Toronto Star, June 23

Fred Hiltz, bishop of N.S. and P.E.I., elected new leader of Anglican Church
The new head of the Anglican Church of Canada was only elected for a few minutes Friday before he faced reporters' questions about where he stands on same-sex unions.
Canadian Press, June 23

Anglican Church of Canada disagrees on process for vote on same-sex union
The question of whether to bless same-sex unions remained unanswered for Anglicans Saturday, so they will tackle it again on Sunday. Instead of debating the issue Saturday night, delegates at the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada spent hours wrangling over procedural issues. They talked about such things as whether the vote should be spread over two synods, which happen every three years.
Canadian Press, June 23

Anglican bishops shoot down same-sex marriage blessings
A razor-thin majority of Canada's Anglican bishops on Sunday overrode the wishes of their laity and clergy and vetoed a resolution that would have allowed for blessings in church settings of committed homosexual unions.
Globe and Mail, June 24

The Anglican Church of Canada moves closer to blessing same sex unions
Canadian Anglicans inched closer towards blessing same sex unions, but stopped short of giving priests the power to perform ceremonies. The Anglican Church of Canada agreed that same sex blessings do not conflict with its core doctrine, a decision that paves the way for the practice. But ultimately, delegates voting Sunday at the General Synod rejected the idea of letting individual dioceses decide whether their priests could perform blessing ceremonies for same sex couples who were married in civil ceremonies.
Canadian Press, June 24

Anglicans vote down same-sex blessings
In a decision that divided the denomination's hierarchy from its grassroots, the national governing body of the Anglican Church of Canada on Sunday defeated by the tightest of margins a motion to forge ahead with same-sex blessings across the country.
Vancouver Sun, June 25

Gay blessings rejected
After a weekend of emotional debate at the Church's national meeting in Winnipeg, a majority of the 300 Anglican delegates here agreed to approve same-sex blessing ceremonies. For the decision to stand, however, Church law requires not a simple majority, but separate majorities among priests and laity, and also among the Church's 40 Canadian bishops. And while the priests and laity approved the move, it was voted down by a narrow majority of two bishops.
National Post, June 25

Anglicans reject same-sex blessings
Church says they don't conflict with core doctrine, but priests can't perform them
Ottawa Citizen, June 25

Vancouver bishop won't give up fight for rights
Some conservative Anglicans were smiling Monday after New Westminster Bishop Michael Ingham withdrew a motion that would have asked the national governing body of the Anglican Church of Canada to allow his diocese to continue blessing same-sex couples. The day after bishops blocked a Sunday attempt by lay people and clergy to approve same-sex blessings across the country, Ingham said Monday he needs to reflect more fully on what the no vote means.
Vancouver Sun, June 26

Homophobia accepted in church, bishop says
Bishop Michael Ingham of the Vancouver-area diocese of New Westminster said homophobia, hiding behind interpretations of scripture, remains an acceptable prejudice in Canadian Anglicanism. "There are members of our church who staunchly defend that. In my view, [it] is a total misreading of scripture and a misuse of the Bible to oppress people. But they clearly want to continue to do that."
Globe and Mail, June 26

Slumping membership doesn't rate on Anglican agenda
Church losing 13,000 a year: study
Ottawa Citizen, June 26

June 28/2007

Comments

The ramifications of last week's General Synod vote in Winnipeg will be a heavy burden for the Anglican Church of Canada and I doubt that the 'ordinary Anglican' has any idea what to expect. The ACC has enthroned a Primate with limited experience and even less courage: Hiltz refused to debate his worthiness for such a position outside his comfort zone of the 'Anglican family' despite the obvious political 'clout' attached to his new status as Canada's senior Anglican. Primate Hiltz and the rest of the Anglican clergy continue to avoid any declaration of their individual sexual orientation, and this being the case, how can Primatal guidance on the Same Sex Blessings issue [SSB] be seen as anything short of utter hypocrisy? This, along with Canterbury's cowardly reversal of support, will cause serious hardship and separation to homosexual Anglicans: something that is completely contrary to intentions of 'moderate' lobby within the ACC that elected him.

Add to this Chain Saw Hiltz's fiscally conservative policy of axing parishes left, right and centre in order to pay the priesthood and enhance the seat of power, and his totally irresponsible and misleading fundraising techniques utilizing professional fundraisers to gouge millions of dollars for subtly shifting charitable goals and you have a man who's adoration of Mammon is undeniable.

A side issue for Anglicans in Nova Scotia and PEI might be the identity of their future Diocesan Bishop. I am willing to bet that Bishop Sue Moxon will be reaping her just reward for supporting Hiltz to the hilt in his 'Leap for Faith' Capital Campaign; however, where does that leave Episcopal [conservative] Anglicans here? The answer is simply: "Out in the cold!"

Finally, how long is it going to take Chain Saw Fred to cut the Anglican Church of Canada in half? Intelligent guesses range from three to eight years. Schism is now inevitable because the conservatives cannot live with Hiltz's objectives. I suppose he could do a monumental about face like Rowan Williams, but I believe his political naivety will hamper such a move.

I warned the 2007 General Synod delegates that the devil moved in their midst and now they must live with the consequences. I guess the Holy Spirit had more important work on hand than to be in Winnipeg for the Anglican General Synod.
#1 Rev. Malachy Egan - 06/29/2007 - 11:01

"Traditional Christians can't take comfort in the vote," he said, "and those who want to
move on are held back by a small number of bishops." - Ingham

Move on, movers, I say! Just like Ed Hird. The road is wide that leads to destruction and no one is stopping you, not even God. Go the way your flesh and culture leads you, and forsake the will and Word of God. You have free will. Just leave the 'traditional Christians' to their Bible and following God's will and go and start your own man-ordained, homosexually-approved churches. I'm sure it'll be a hit in our age. God will be against you and eventually utterly destroy you, but you may get some good attendance beforehand to cash in on.

And if for some reason there are more deceived people in leadership than solid, just do an official name change to "The Sanctified Anglican Church of Canada" and let the others receive in themselves, for eternity, what God has promised for them in His word.

Please just don't waste any more time and energy of those Anglicans who want to reject this horrendous movement... Or my time, for that matter. It's like watching a bad political debate but all the more embarrassing.

Wayne Taylor - Former Anglican
#2 Wayne Taylor - 06/29/2007 - 13:04

I find it truly sad that alot of Anglicans reject the word of God. I grieve along with faithful Anglicans who are as shocked as I. If they will not listen to the word of God they are no longer a church,

Now the question needs to be asked. Do they love the denomination more or God's truth.

Its time to Go and leave them to the sins they have chosen inplace God.

NIV
1Co 5:10 not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world.
1Co 5:11 But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.
1Co 5:12 What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?
1Co 5:13 God will judge those outside.
#3 Bryan Matheson - 07/06/2007 - 05:29

July 6/07
I am not an Anglican now but was born one. The other side of the family was United.
What a terrible dilemna to see both churchs bow before Satan.
How is it possible that the head group of both churches cannot read what the Lord has written? And what if I wanted to return to either denomination?
God is the same yesteday, today and forever. I never thought 2 of His largest denominations would willfully turn their backs on His Power and Wisdom.
We are already bringing judgement onto ourselves and we know who to blame. I say very clearly - DUCK.

God help us in our unbelief!
#4 Judith Connell - 07/06/2007 - 05:33

The Bible was written by men and translated repeatedly from doffering perspectives. The writers lived at a time when there was minimal understanding of the world in which they lived. Men who didn't marry and have children were seen a not contributing to the numbers needed for safety, at a time when life was precarious and communities were very dangerous.We have progressed two millenia since those times.Much of today's knowledge would have been considered 'mad' , or heresy, and earned you death by burning alive, or skinned alive.In this 21st century there can be no greater insult to a Creator than to see the Bible as the literal word of such a deity.For an entity reported to be omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent , the Bible is a total insult to such power and eternal love.The Bible , cupcakes; has been updated all throughout history , but you somehow missed it. The updates are found in books called Physics, Biology , Chemistry and Mathematics.
#5 Hugh Vincelette - 07/06/2007 - 20:24

I was raised in the traditions of the United, Anglican and Lutheran churches. Each town I lived in could support only one or two churches. I learned to to listen to others beliefs and to read the bibile to attempt to develop my own. Although each group is different in the details, we are all Chrisitians.

But I have always had a problem accepting those who promote promote themselves rather than the church. How can a person who has committed adultery, lied about his relationship, does not accept the teachings of the body he belongs to, then be set before us as a leader and teacher to guide us in our morality and faith. It is time that all of us examined our beliefs. Are we living our christianity, or are we sacrificing it to "WIN" the battle for a following.
#6 Leif Pedersen - 07/08/2007 - 10:09

Comment
To prevent automated Bots form spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



Email (won't be shown)
Name

canadianchristianity.com encourages readers feedback, and in the forum interaction. We will not edit your comments, but reserve the right to select responses and delete any inappropriate ones. All comments are immediately forwarded, read and screened. To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.