|
By Lloyd Mackey
THE BALANCING of parental and gay rights under Alberta human rights legislation has kept legislators and advocacy groups in combat over the past five weeks.
Then, in the early hours of Tuesday, June 2, after several hours of heated debate, the legislature passed Bill 44. The bill will enshrine gay rights in the province, while giving parents the option of withdrawing their children from classes dealing with curriculum material related to sexual orientation, sexuality or religion.
While Premier Ed Stelmach permitted a free vote, the house divided on party lines: 35 Conservatives favoured the measure and seven from the opposition Liberal and NDP parties voted against it.
Amendments introduced shortly before the vote ensured that parents could not withdraw children from classes where discussions in touchy areas came about spontaneously -- only, rather, when curriculum deals directly with those areas. Further, the bill can be interpreted in such a way that parents could withdraw their children not only when discussion turns to sexual orientation, but when it turns to topics like creationism and evolution, as well.
Bernie Potgan, head of the education program at Ambrose University College, told CC.com he would encourage Christian parents to be optimistic about "the rich opportunities" provided through exposure to diverse views on sensitive issues.
Ambrose is an evangelically-rooted Calgary institution and Potvan is responsible for building the school's teacher education program. Part of his reassurance comes from C. S. Lewis' suggestion that "the universe rings true", he said.
He cautioned that Christian public school teachers, expected to handle sensitive subjects, may find that they receive "knee jerk" reactions from Christian parents.
"The issues are complex. And often, the evangelical response is to look for simple solutions," he suggested.
"For example, as a parent, I want my kids to know that abortion is wrong. But, if the subject is taught [as though it were] right, this presents the richest of opportunities. And it provides for a timely conversation with my (grade eight) daughter."
However, if children have permission to be withdrawn from a class, Ambrose "would want teachers (we educate) to comply," said Potvan.
Despite the current controversy, he predicted that "the bill will go quietly into the night."
Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blackett expressed a similar sentiment when Bill 44 came before the legislature. He told the opposition, which voted against the bill, "This will come to pass (and members) will forget about this in another month. Talk to me in a year."
Potvan referred to Jeremiah 29, where the prophet urged those who were in captivity in Babylon to "build homes and plan to stay; plant vineyards for you will be there many years. Marry and have children, and then find husbands or wives for them and have many grandchildren . . . And work for the peace and prosperity of Babylon. Pray for her, for if Babylon has peace, so will you."
Bill 44 came about because of a Supreme Court of Canada decision 11 years ago that directed Alberta to add sexual orientation to its human rights legislation. The relevant act already included provisions against discrimination on the basis of religion, gender and race.
The 1998 high court case ruled in favor of Delwin Vriend, a gay man who had been fired in 1991 from his post as an instructor at King's University College in Edmonton. Vriend, in turn, had been fired because the school, which is linked to the Christian Reformed church, had a lifestyle statement that precluded openly non-celibate gay relationships.
The court ruled provincial governments could not exclude lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgendered (LGBT) individuals from human rights legislation.
The Alberta government steered clear of making the court-urged changes during the years of Ralph Klein's premiership. His successor and fellow Conservative, Ed Stelmach, decided to bring the province's human rights legislation into line with the court ruling and, in the process, to ensure that parental rights were included, as well.
It was the latter that has stirred a fair amount of public discussion in the run up to the passage of Bill 44.
Parents' rights groups defended the bill as it stood. United Mothers and Fathers Canada quoted Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says "parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children."
Conversely, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association claimed Bill 44 will "help to promote a regime of religious ignorance."
To both groups, Blackett responded that "for myself and for most everybody, it is a simple thing about being a parent and being involved."
Parental, gay and religious rights issues have not been confined to Alberta schools in recent years.
In recent years, what is commonly called the 'Corren agreement' has been strongly debated in British Columbia. Three years ago, a gay couple whose surname is Corren struck an agreement with the BC education ministry that gives the couple the right to vet all curriculum proposals to ensure that teaching materials are 'gay friendly.'
Critics of the agreement maintain that the ministry does not permit the same access to the critiquing process for traditional family proponents.
In Quebec, parents are limited in their right to opt their children out of the province's new Ethics and Religious Culture course. That course was designed to fill a gap left following the deconstruction of the province's religiously-based educational sytems.
And, recently, the California state senate passed a bill asking the governor to "proclaim May 22 of each year as Harvey Milk Day, and . . . designate that date as having special significance in public schools and educational institutions and . . . encourage those entities to conduct suitable commemorative exercises on that date."
Milk was a gay San Francisco civic politician who was assassinated, along with Mayor George Moscone, by a colleague in 1978. He has been viewed, in intervening years, as a gay rights martyr.
Continue article >>
|
Related stories:
Alberta's law to embrace gay rights Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blackett wants to include sexual orientation in the province's human rights laws, possibly as early as this spring. His proposed reform package will also include a new "parent's choice" provision, enshrining parental rights to withdraw their children from parts of the school curriculum that conflict with their religious beliefs. Edmonton Journal, March 27
NDP says it's shameful that Alberta is the last province to enshrine gay rights But there's a controversial twist to the legislation being used by Alberta's Progressive Conservative government to settle this longstanding battle over gay rights. The legislation will give parents the right to exclude their kids from parts of the education curriculum that they don't agree with, including anything to do with same-sex relationships. Premier Ed Stelmach concedes this opting-out provision could be used for classes dealing with evolution if parents preferred their kids be taught what's in the bible instead. Canadian Press, April 28
Teachers, experts fear chill in classroom if Alberta legislation goes ahead The change says parents should be notified when classes "include subject matter that deals explicitly with religion, sexuality or sexual orientation," and should have the right to ask that their child sit out that part of the class. The term "religion" is extremely broad and could edge its way into almost anything that comes up in the classroom, said Dan Shapiro, research associate with the Calgary-based Sheldon Chumir Foundation for Ethics in Leadership. Canadian Press, May 3
Ed Stelmach, up to his knees in turd And then Premier Ed Stelmach's government finally unveiled its proposed reforms, spinning a golden political opportunity into dross. Under the proposed Bill 44, the section prohibiting expressing ideas "likely to expose a person or a class of persons to hatred or contempt" goes entirely untouched, shocking freethinking Albertans and chastening Blackett. Not surprisingly, given the Supreme Court rulings on the matter, the province will add to the HRC's mandate protection for gays and lesbians. But in an entirely unexpected and rather woolly move, the province will add the right of parents to pull their kids out of classrooms should they dislike any sexual or religious messages being taught there. So, while you can't write or speak anything critical about gays, even if you happen to be a cleric of a religion that has something to say on the matter, pulling your kids out of a classroom where there's mere talk of the existence of gayness is now an Albertan human right. Kevin Libin, Full Comment, National Post, May 6
Why we must teach religion in schools The government of Alberta had a great opportunity recently to reign in the abuses of human rights law in that province -- in particular those concerning the empowering of Human Rights Commissions to censor statements causing offence or insult. Instead, it opted to go in the opposite direction, and is now attempting to pass Bill 44, the notorious Human Rights, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Amendment Act. This legislation would copy "parental choice" from the School Act, thereby installing -- as a new human right -- the right to deprive children of a full education. Justin Trottier, Holy Post, National Post, May 13
Alberta's classroom opt-out law faces new criticism As a proposal to allow parents to pull their children from classes on religion and sexuality inches closer to becoming law in Alberta, an influential Toronto-based civil liberties organization has become the latest group to oppose it. Globe and Mail, May 25
Alta pushes ahead with law to allow parents to pull kids from lessons on gays Alberta is pushing ahead with Canada's first legislation to give parents the power under its human rights code to pull their children from lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation. In response to widespread criticism from school boards and human rights groups, Premier Ed Stelmach's government has made only minor wording changes to the bill. Canadian Press, May 27
Alberta moves to enshrine parents' rights in classroom As Alberta is set to become the first province to give parents the right to take their children out of classes that deal with religion and sexuality, some parents are confused why the government ever waded into this human-rights minefield in the first place. Globe and Mail, May 28
Alberta opts for hillbilly human rights When it comes to promoting itself to the world, Alberta has been having messaging problems of late. . . . the Culture Minister's plans to reform his Ministry's human rights code -- so, he once said, Alberta would increasingly be "seen to be inclusive and tolerant" to tourists, immigrants and investors -- has critics complaining now that his proposal achieves precisely the opposite effect. Kevin Libin, Full Comment, National Post, May 28
Alberta allows parents to pull kids from controversial classes Following a marathon debate, the Alberta legislature has passed human rights legislation letting parents pull their children out of lessons on sex, religion or sexual orientation. Members of the legislature adopted the bill at about 1:30 a.m. MT Tuesday after hearing objections from teachers, school boards and human rights groups saying it should be scrapped. Globe and Mail, June 2
Alberta's Bill 44 will be good for both conservatives and liberals Nothing illustrates the difference between the conservative and liberal casts of mind more eloquently than the tense face-off in Alberta over Bill 44, which on June 2 introduced to Alberta's Human Rights Act the right of parents to withdraw their children from classes in which teachers discuss sexual orientation, sexuality or religion. Barbara Kay, Full Comment, National Post, June 4
June 4/2009
|