|
A WIDESPREAD debate on the ‘reasonable
accommodation’ of minorities has convulsed Quebec society – and
could set precedents that impact all of Canada.
The debate grew out of a series of somewhat minor
incidents over the past two years.
A Sikh student went to court and won the right to wear
a kirpan at school. Some Hasidic Jews asked the YWCA to install tinted
glass so women in shorts could not be seen exercising. A Muslim girl was
forbidden to wear a hijab or head scarf on the soccer field.
A worker was asked not to eat his lunch containing a
pork sandwich in the kosher cafeteria of a hospital. Some Muslims and
Hasidic Jews objected to being interviewed by police personnel of the
opposite gender, or wanted driving instructors of the same gender. Some
Hindu, Muslim and Jewish women asked to be seen only by a female doctor at
medical clinics.
The legal term applied to many of these issues is
“reasonable accommodation.” However, “regular laws that
govern the majority sometimes cause injustice if applied to a
minority,” said Salam Elmenyawi, president of the Muslim Council of
Montreal.
For instance, some labour laws might force a person to
work on a religious holiday. Therefore, courts and rights tribunals have
ordered institutions to accommodate to minorities – as long as those
accommodations “do not cause undue hardship to the
institution.”
Continue article >>
|
For example, having a school provide a private place
where Muslims students can pray quietly would be a reasonable
accommodation, but requiring the school to build a mosque for them would
not.
Court decisions in favour of accommodation have created
something of a backlash in mainstream Quebec society.
This became visible in January, when the small town of
Herouxville adopted a “code of conduct” telling immigrants how
to “integrate socially.”
One result of the controversy was the establishment of
the Consultation Commission on Accommodation Practices Related to Cultural
Differences.
The Commission’s public hearings, beginning in
August, have sometimes been dominated by mainstream Quebecois opposed to
accommodation.
Elmenyawi said the hearings have become “a
platform for racism and xenophobia.” While he is confident that a
majority of French-Canadians are more tolerant, he said he is concerned
that a desire for integration might lead to a demand for assimilation.
The Commission will issue a report in March.
–
Jim Coggins
December 2007
|