Tapestry; creationists have not been given an equal opportunity to respond.
“The media is overwhelmingly liberal,” said Sarfati. He went on to state that very few of the people who support
evolution go to church.
He felt the need to specifically refute Dawkins, because of his notoriety as the
world’s leading Darwinist and one of the key proponents of a militant new form of
atheism.
At a conference in Melbourne, Sarfati invited Dawkins to join him in a debate.
He declined.
According to Sarfati, people need to hear the truth of biblical accounts.
“Along the way, we abandoned Genesis as real history.” He hastened to add that, although he does believe Genesis is a true account of
the world’s creation, ‘literal’ is not quite the right word to use.
But he maintained it was written in a style which the original readers of Hebrew
would have interpreted as real history.
While many creationists have not accepted the evolutionist concept of natural
selection, Sarfati believes this theory fits with God’s plan. He likened natural selection to the process of a “sculptor sculpting” – as opposed to something evolving on its own.
Regarding the origin of the human race, Sarfati said he believes “Adam was a special creation – and from him Eve” was made from dust – but filled with the breath of life from God. Salvation, he contended, is linked
to the historical reality of the first couple.
“Luke 3 traces the ancestry of Jesus directly back to Adam,” he said.
Dawkins is on record as a scornful opponent of organized religion. In his 1997
essay, ‘Is Science a Religion?’ he presented the view that parents who teach their children about religion are
inflicting “mental child abuse” upon them.
Sarfati’s response to this comment was equally blunt: “It shows the inflammatory and paranoid language that atheists use.”
He also stated that the use of such irresponsible rhetoric undermines the
seriousness of actual mental child abuse.
“In North America, evolutionists bamboozle [people] in the science,” said Sarfati.
“Atheism has prospered by stealth, by making God irrelevant for the real world.”
He said he sees his job as encouraging others to challenge evolution, and
demonstrating how biblical assumptions are necessary in understanding the
history of the world.
He cited archaeology as one effective means, maintaining there is a lot of
archaeological evidence to support what the Bible says.
December 2010