|
By Steve Weatherbe
YOUTH Protecting Youth (YPY), the controversial pro-life group at the University
of Victoria (UVic), can’t win for losing. In fact, it can’t even give money away.
Two years into a dispute with the pro-choice UVic student society, it recently
approached the university with the offer of a $300-bursary for a single
mother/student. A university Senate committee has rejected the offer.
Commented Anastasia Pearse, the president of YPY: “It’s unacceptable that UVic should take a hands-off attitude to an organization
offering bursaries because it is controversial. The university’s role is not to protect its students from controversy, but rather encourage
dialogue and equal access to opportunities for both sides, and then allow
students to make their own decisions.”
Robert Holmes, president of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA),
agreed. “Assuming the university is responding to pressure from those who disagree with
YPY, it is not showing the kind of steely backbone I would like to see in an
institution holding itself forth as courageous and committed to intellectual
freedom.”
While the chair of the Senate Committee on Awards, Annalee Lepp, declined to
speak with BCCN, university secretary Julia Eastman offered this explanation for decision. “I believe the rationale was that the committee did not want to create the
perception of a formal association” with YPY.
When it was pointed out that the university accepts many bursaries from
organizations with whom the university has no ‘formal association,’ Eastman added a second reason: “The committee has problems with the manner in which the group [YPY] expresses
its views.”
So, famously, does the UVic student society board of directors, and the Students for Choice group. Two years ago, they objected to YPY posters on
display.
One showed pregnant women with the slogan ‘Choose life’; another showed children and elderly people, with the slogan, ‘We are not the enemy.’
Members of Students for Choice tore them down. The student society’s board of directors approved the action, then took away YPY’s club funding – ironically justifying this on the grounds that the group was “intimidating.”
Each semester since, other clubs have voted for YPY funding and the student
board has reversed the decisions, on various grounds: that YPY is deceiving
women by presenting research about the health risks abortion poses; that it is
racist for comparing abortion to the Holocaust; and that opposing abortion is
tantamount to “making war” on all women. And perhaps worst of all, the group shows horrible pictures.
Last term, YPY brought in pro-life professional Stephanie Gray, executive
director of the Calgary-based Centre for Bioethical Reform – considered an arch nemesis by some in the campus pro-abortion movement.
Continue article >>
|
In her debate with a pro-choice advocate, Gray showed a video of an abortion in
progress that concluded with a close-up of the tiny, bloody hand of an aborted
fetus.
Gray’s presence, and her graphic imagery, were then touted as more proof that the
student society’s board should again withhold YPY’s funding. It did.
YPY has formally complained to the university about the society, with the
support of the BCCLA.
According to Holmes, there is a case to be made that the university and the
student society are both subject to action based on the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, and its protection for free speech.
“We are waiting to see how the internal actions of the university play out – and hoping that the student society will come to its senses.” But if it doesn’t, “the matter could well end up in court.”
As for the bursary, Holmes doubts it is a matter for the courts because there is
no legal right “to throw money at a government institution like a university.”
According to David Foster, the student representative on the awards committee,
YPY’s offer was initially approved. But chairperson Lepp then called for a review,
at which the university president’s representative on the committee, Dr. Catherine Mateer, moved that the offer be
rejected.
Eastman says the issue is not one of free speech or discussion, which the
university encourages. She points to YPY’s use of a university building for the debate involving Gray.
Pearse said the refusal of YPY’s offer, when the group is in a dispute with those in favour of abortion, “makes it seem like they are taking an anti-YPY position – when they should be neutral. It’s unfortunate that a single mother will be denied this money, or easy access to
it, because of this decision.”
YPY will still look for ways to get the money, which was donated, to a single
mother.
February 2010
|
